USPTO serial 75606437
BARKER BONES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BARKER BONES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Etobicoke, CA
Etobicoke, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Dog food, namely dog biscuits and dog treats | ACTIVE | Dec 29, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |