USPTO serial 75607183
PARADIGM GENETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2919179Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 18, 2005
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PARADIGM GENETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Research Triangle Park, NC
Research Triangle Park, NC
Research Triangle Park, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Catlett
Matthew Catlett Clinical Data, Inc.One Gateway CenterSuite 702Newton, MA 02458Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research and development services in agricultural genetics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |