USPTO serial 75607944
WQC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WQC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Reading Berks RG1 8DB, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seymour Rothstein
SEYMOUR ROTHSTEIN OLSON & HIERL, LTD20 NORH WACKER DR 36TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Distilled water; conditioned sludge and sewage for use as fertilizers for agricultural or domestic use, in Class 1;Soil, sewage, waste, effluent, foodstuffs and water treatments, in Class 40;Technical consultation and research in the fields of water, effluent sewage, waste, soil and sludge treatment; microbiological and physicochemical analytical services and consultancy; material treatment, in Cl | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Apparatus for testing soils, sewage, waste and water for contaminants and parts therefor, in Class 9 | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Sewage and industrial effluent treatment plants; water purification units; filtering units and sterilizers for decontamination of polluted soils | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction of facilities used for the treatment and testing of soil, water, sewage, sludge, sediment, effluent, foodstuffs and waste; waste disposal for others, namely, disposal of sewage, sludge, sediment, effluent, foodstuffs and waste | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Public utility services in the nature of distribution and supply of water | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | material treatment of soil, sewage, waste, effluent and foodstuffs; water treatment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation and research in the fields of water, effluent sewage, waste, soil and sludge treatment; microbiological and physicochemical analytical services and consultation services; material treatment consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thames Water Utilities Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WQC
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |