USPTO serial 75613189
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Specialised Petroleum Services Limited
Aberdeenshire, SCOTLAND, GB
Other trademarks owned by Specialised Petroleum Services Limited
Specialised Petroleum Services Limited
Aberdeenshire, SCOTLAND, GB
Other trademarks owned by Specialised Petroleum Services Limited
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Y J Kim
DANIEL Y J KIM FLESHNER & KIM14500 AVION PKWY STE 125CHANTILLY, VA 20151UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER OPERATED DOWNHOLE TOOLS USED FOR THE DRILLING OF OIL AND GAS, NAMELY, POWER OPERATED DRILL BITS, REAMERS, CUTTERS, JUNK SUBS AND DEBRIS CATCHERS; POWER OPERATED WELL CLEANING DOWNHOLE TOOLS, NAMELY, POWER OPERATED WIPERS, SCRAPERS, BRUSH TOOLS, POLISHERS AND SCOURERS FOR MAINTAINING A CLEAN INTERIOR OF A CASING OR LINER WITHIN A WELL BORE; POWER OPERATED FLUID FILTERS FOR SELECTIVELY FILTERING AND REMOVING SOLIDS FORM DOWNHOLE FLUIDS; AND POWER OPERATED FLUID CIRCULATORS THAT CAUSE DOWNHOLE FLUID TO IMPACT THE INTERIOR OF A CASING OR A LINER WITHIN A WELL BORE TO PROVIDE A CLEANING ACTION AND WHICH SELECT A PATH FOR FLUID FLOW IN A CASING OR LINER OF A WELL BORE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |