USPTO serial 75615140
BABY ESSENTIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 2002
- Examiner
- DONNELL, RICHARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BABY ESSENTIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics, Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics, Inc.
Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics, Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics, Inc.
Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics, Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLEY A. MORADIAN
LESLEY A MORADIAN ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES767 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body wash and shampoo, shampoos and conditioners for hair, body balm, body oil, body powder, massage oil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BABY ESSENTIALS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |