USPTO serial 75617320
STREET SMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STREET SMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK J. DILIBERTI
MARK J DILIBERTI FOLLY & LARDNER777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business marketing consultation services for those in the automotive industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named STREET SMART
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |