USPTO serial 75617582
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
NANCY V STEPHENS FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC1111 THIRD AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing interactive computer databases and on-line information services via a global computer network, wide area networks and local area networks in the fields of computers, software, information technology, communication, and emerging technologies such as multimedia art, digital and interactive entertainment systems, audio and video signal compression, audio and video computerized morphing and human-computer interaction design; computer programming services for others, namely, the development of computer software programs on discs and CD-ROMs in the fields of sports, music, music history, musical instruments, popular culture, cinema, art, personalities, history, education, television, motion pictures, entertainment, business, accounting, management, sales and marketing, finance, computers, information technology, communication, leadership, personal growth, and emerging technologies such as multimedia art, digital and interactive entertainment systems, audio and video computerized morphing and human-computer interaction design; web-hosting services for others; computer software programming and design services for others; restaurant services; and providing facilities for conventions | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |