USPTO serial 75618119
CLICK THRU VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 2002
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLICK THRU VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Culver City, CA
Culver City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Grace
DAVID W GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVDSTE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4164Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS AND COMPUTERIZED RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS, VIDEOS, AND CLOTHING ON-LINE OVER CABLE, TELEPHONE, AND SATELLITE BROAD BAND NETWORKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | VIDEO ON DEMAND TRANSMISSION SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |