USPTO serial 75623209
INPRINT.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INPRINT.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl F. Milde, Jr.
KARL F MILDE JR MILDE, HOFFBERG & MACKLIN LLP10 BANK ST STE 460WHITE PLAINS, NY 10606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS, MAGAZINES, POSTERS, NEWSLETTERS AND JOURNALS, FEATURING WORKS OF FICTION AND NON-FICTION AND GRAPHIC ART WORKS STORED IN DIGITAL FORM ON COMPUTER MEMORY, MAGNETIC TAPES AND CD-ROMS | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 1998 |
| 016 | PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS, MAGAZINES, POSTERS, NEWSLETTERS AND JOURNALS, FEATURING WORKS OF FICTION AND NON-FICTION AND GRAPHIC ART WORKS | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 1998 |
| 041 | PUBLISHING SERVICES FOR BOOKS, MAGAZINES, POSTERS, NEWSLETTERS AND JOURNALS, FEATURING WORKS OF FICTION AND NON-FICTION AND GRAPHIC ART WORKS | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |