USPTO serial 75623460
THEORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3076973Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 4, 2006
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THEORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B. Goldsmith
Amy B. Goldsmith GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, P.C.270 Madison Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CARE PRODUCTS FOR THE FACE, BODY, HANDS AND FEET, NAMELY, CLEANSING LOTION, CLEANSING BARS, CLEANSING CREAM, OIL-FREE CLEANSING LOTION, OIL-FREE CLEANSING BARS, OIL-FREE CLEANSING CREAM, CLEANSING MILK, ASTRINGENTS, TONER, TONING LOTIONS, FACIAL MASQUES, MAKE-UP REMOVAL CREAM, MAKEUP REMOVAL OIL, NIGHT CREAM, OIL-FREE MOISTURIZER, WATER-BASED MOISTURIZERS, FOUNDATION MOISTURIZERS, ANTI-AGING CREAM, ANTI-WRINKLE CREAM, ANTI-WRINKLE SERUM, ANTI-WRINKLE OIL, SUNBLOCK MOISTURIZER, SUNBLOCK CREAM, AFTER-SUN LOTION, SUNTANNING PRODUCTS, SUNLESS TANNING LOTION AND SUNLESS TANNING SPRAY, SUNBURN CREAM, EXFOLIATOR, FACIAL MASKS, BODY POWDERS AND SPRAYS, PERFUMES, COLOGNES, DEODORANTS AND TOILET WATERS, BODY SPLASHES AND MOISTURIZING BODY MISTS, AFTER SHAVE LOTIONS, NAIL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL ENAMEL REMOVER, CUTICLE REMOVER, NAIL BASE COAT, NAIL DRYING PREPARATIONS, NAIL TOP COAT, NAIL SAVING PREPARATIONS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Dec 20, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |