USPTO serial 75624876
STEIFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2004
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STEIFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
89537 Giengen, DE
89537 Giengen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Friedrich Kueffner
317 MADISON AVE STE 910NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Margarete Steiff GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Margarete Steiff GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named STEIFF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |