USPTO serial 75625873
PHENOMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHENOMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
30000 Nimes, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A. CLIFFORD, ESQ.
JOHN A CLIFFORD ESQ MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | industrial enzyme research in the chemical and agricultural fields | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1999 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |