USPTO serial 75626321
USIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with USIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
DAVID J DAVIS BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software providing step-by step instructions concerning the installation of telecommunications equipment (namely, telephones, telephone jacks, telephone cables, answering machines, speakerphones and fax machines), computer hardware, (namely, personal computers, network cards, network hubs, network routers and network switches), and office equipment related to the use of telecommunications equipment and computer hardware (namely, office furniture, office requisites and office decorations | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Installation and maintenance of telecommunications equipment and computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing consultation in the fields of telecommunications apparatus and installations and computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |