USPTO serial 75633699
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Diego, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin Segall
KARIN SEGALL DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROVIDING INSTALLATION, MANAGEMENT, UPDATING, STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL OF VIDEO IMAGES OR CLIPS AND ASSOCIATED MULTIMEDIA DATA COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DIRECTING AND DELIVERING MULTIMEDIA DATA THROUGH A COMPUTER NETWORK AND THE MANAGEMENT OF MARKETING AND PROMOTIONAL SERVICES, INCLUDING SERVICES FOR SELLERS, RESELLERS AND SUBSCRIBERS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, DATA DISTRIBUTION AND SIGNAL TRANSMISSION SERVICES, PROVIDED VIA A TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR BUILDING TRAFFIC FOR WEB SITES OF OTHERS, PROMOTING FOR OTHER EVENTS AND POINTS OF INTEREST WHICH CAN BE ACCESSED THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SUCH PROMOTIONS | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 1998 |
| 035 | advertising, promotion and marketing services, namely, building traffic for web sites of others and promoting events and points of interest to others and measuring the effectiveness of such promotions, rendered through a global computer network | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 1998 |
| 038 | providing telecommunications transmissions and data communications, namely, satellite transmissions, radio transmissions, television transmissions, cable transmissions, fiber optic transmissions, namely, OC-class transmissions (such as OC-1, OC-3), cellular transmissions, and landline data transmissions, namely, fractional T-1s, T-1s, T-3s, and DS-3s, to a global computer network | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 1998 |
| 039 | providing storage and retrieval of video image or clips and associated data that may be downloaded, streamed, or otherwise delivered from a computer network | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 1998 |
| 040 | VIDEO AND AUDIO ENCODING SERVICES | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 1998 |
| 041 | MULTI-MEDIA PRODUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING MULTIMEDIA CONTENT, VIDEO IMAGES OR CLIPS AND ASSOCIATED DATA THAT MAY BE DOWNLOADED, STREAMED, OR OTHERWISE DELIVERED FROM A COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 1998 |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, WEB SITE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN THROUGH THE USE OF VIDEO, AUDIO, AND MULTIMEDIA FORMATS | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |