USPTO serial 75635084
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
S.O.I.TEC Silicon On Insulator Technologies
38190 BERNIN, FR
Other trademarks owned by S.O.I.TEC Silicon On Insulator Technologies
S.O.I.TEC Silicon On Insulator Technologies
38190 BERNIN, FR
Other trademarks owned by S.O.I.TEC Silicon On Insulator Technologies
S.O.I.TEC Silicon On Insulator Technologies
38190 BERNIN, FR
Other trademarks owned by S.O.I.TEC Silicon On Insulator Technologies
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BREWSTER TAYLOR
BREWSTER TAYLOR STITES & HARBISON PLLC1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1437UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICROELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, NAMELY, SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATES AND WAFERS, FOR USE IN FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS, INTEGRATED OPTICAL WAVE GUIDES, SENSORS AND MICROMACHINERY DEVICES; SILICON WAFERS FOR USE IN MICROELECTRONICS DEVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |