USPTO serial 75635400
BIO-TRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIO-TRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
King of Prussia, PA
King of Prussia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN F A EARLEY
JOHN F A EARLEY HARDING EARLEY FOLLMER & FRAILEYP O BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | SKIN AND BODY CARE PREPARATIONS FOR USE IN COSMETIC AND THERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS, NAMELY, SKIN BRUSHING DEVICES, VACUUM AND SPRAY DEVICES FOR SKIN CLEANSING, HIGH FREQUENCY SKIN DEVICES FOR STIMULATING THE SKIN, GALVANIC SKIN DEVICES FOR STIMULATING THE SKIN, FACIAL STEAMERS AND VAPORIZERS FOR SKIN CLEANSING AND MOISTURIZING, WOOD'S LAMP FOR ILLUMINATING THE SKIN, MAGNIFYING LAMPS FOR ILLUMINATING THE SKIN, FACIAL BEDS, AESTHETICIAN STOOLS, WAX WARMERS AND TROLLEY STANDS FOR HOLDING TREATMENT INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |