USPTO serial 75635633
ECONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jere M. Webb
JERE M WEBB STOEL RIVES LLP900 SW FIFTH AVESTE 2600PORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION AND BROADCAST OF VIDEO, AUDIO AND DATA, VIDEO TELECONFERENCING SERVICES, TELEVISION TRANSMISSION AND BROADCAST SERVICES, ALL VIA AREA NETWORKS AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING HIGH SPEED ACCESS TO AREA NETWORKS AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING HIGH SPEED AUDIO AND VIDEO ENABLED MULTI-USER ACCESS TO AREA NETWORKS AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING CONSULTING SERVICES FOR AUDIO, VIDEO, AND DATA COMMUNICATIONS THROUGH AREA NETWORKS AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING CONTENT IN THE NATURE OF AUDIO, VIDEO, AND DATA VIA AREA NETWORKS AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |