Drawing for SOY DELICIOUS

USPTO serial 75635762

SOY DELICIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOY DELICIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALLAN I. ZACKLER

ALLAN I ZACKLER ZACKLER & ASSOC3824 GRAND AVE STE 100OAKLAND, CA 94610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Frozen soy-based non-dairy confectionsACTIVEJul 15, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 19, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 19, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 19, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Dec 12, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Sep 20, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 24, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance