Drawing for SPLISH SPLASH

USPTO serial 75635996

SPLISH SPLASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REGGY, AUMA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPLISH SPLASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allan I. Zackler

ALLAN I ZACKLER ZACKLER & ASSOCIATES3824 GRAND AVE STE 100OAKLAND, CA 94610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Dairy and non-dairy based whipped toppings; dairy based food beverages; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; snack food dips excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips; soy-based and grain-based food beverages used as milk substitutes; soy-based and grain-based substitutes for milk and cheese dairy products excluding substitutes for ice cream, ice milk and frozen desserts; vegetable-based food beverages, all for consumption on or off the premisesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 28, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 28, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 28, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 22, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance