USPTO serial 75636244
H2O NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with H2O NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hillsborough, CA
Renton, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN J. COLLETTE
KEVIN J. COLLETTE RYAN, SWANSON & CLEVELAND, PLLC1201 THIRD AVENUE SUITE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101-3034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely production of news shows, talk shows, public interest shows, and education shows, in the field of boating activities, which are distributed over television, satellite, global computer network, audio and video media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |