USPTO serial 75636686
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samuel J. Najim
RICHARD A ZACHAR VEDDER PRICE KAUFMAN KAMMHOLZSTE 2600222 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CATALOG MAIL ORDER SERVICES FEATURING INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE AND AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR TRADE PRODUCTS- NAMELY, HIGH PERFORMANCE AND SPECIALTY FASTENERS; INDUSTRIAL SHOP SUPPLIES; REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT PARTS AND SPECIALTY HARDWARE, AS WELL AS SPECIALTY ADHESIVES AND CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR AUTOMOBILES, TRUCKS AND CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES; SPECIALTY WELDING PRODUCTS- NAMELY, ELECTRODES, ALLOYS, FLUXES AND SOLDERS; ELECTRICAL SYSTEM COMPONENTS- NAMELY, TERMINALS, CONNECTORS, FITTINGS AND CLAMPS; INDUSTRIAL CLEANERS AND MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS; AND HEAVY-DUTY ELECTRICAL CORD, CABLE AND ASSOCIATED DEVICES | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 6, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1999 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |