USPTO serial 75636731
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alessandro Saracino
Alessandro Saracino Pavia & Harcourt, LLP600 Madison Ave.Fl. 12New York, NY 10022| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Permanent museums in the field of rock and roll music history and memorabilia, namely, arranging and conducting exhibitions in the field of rock and roll music history and memorabilia; traveling museums in the field of rock and roll music history and memorabilia, namely arranging and conducting temporary exhibitions in various locations in the field of rock and roll music history and memorabilia | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing an interactive museum of rock and roll music history and memorabilia, namely, providing an interactive, on-line electronic database on global computer networks in the field of rock and roll music history and memorabilia | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |