USPTO serial 75636981
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dr. Seuss Enterprises L.P. By: Geisel-Seuss Enterprises Inc.
La Jolla, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dr. Seuss Enterprises L.P. By: Geisel-Seuss Enterprises Inc.
Dr. Seuss Enterprises L.P. BY: GEISEL-SEUSS ENTERPRISES, INC.
La Jolla, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dr. Seuss Enterprises L.P. BY: GEISEL-SEUSS ENTERPRISES, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARL ZOBELL
NANCY O DIX GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICHSTE 11004365 EXECUTIVE DRSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-2133| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing articles and apparel, namely, scarves, belts, socks, hosiery, shoes, footwear, headwear, hats, neckwear, gloves, mittens, underwear, swimwear, sleepwear, t-shirts, dress shirts, golf or tennis shirts, collared shirts, sweaters, tops, bottoms, jackets, coats, pants, shorts, slacks, trousers, skirts, dresses, masquerade costumes and masks sold in connection therewith, made of all processes including knits and wovens, in all infant, children's and adult sizes | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |