Drawing for ARTEMIS RECORDS

USPTO serial 75637163

ARTEMIS RECORDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2861839Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 13, 2004
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTEMIS RECORDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward V. Di lello

COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 5TH AVE RM 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176-0091UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, PRERECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTES, PRERECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO COMPACT DISKS, AND PRERECORDED DIGITAL AUDIO AND VIDEOCASSETTES FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF MUSIC AND MUSIC VIDEOSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 28, 2007CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Dec 1, 2006C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Nov 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 27, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 18, 2006C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Sep 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 5, 2005PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 13, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 22, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 28, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance