USPTO serial 75637328
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vernon Hills, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Irwin C. Alter
IRWIN C ALTER ALTER AND WEISS19 S LASALLE STSTE 1650CHICAGO, IL 60603| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail distributorship services featuring ceramic votive houses for the purpose of fund raising in schools | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |