Drawing for LIMITED EDITION

USPTO serial 75637328

LIMITED EDITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIMITED EDITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Irwin C. Alter

IRWIN C ALTER ALTER AND WEISS19 S LASALLE STSTE 1650CHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail distributorship services featuring ceramic votive houses for the purpose of fund raising in schoolsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 15, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Nov 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 5, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 10, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jul 10, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
May 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Feb 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 9, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 8, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Nov 9, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 7, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 18, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 19, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Sep 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 12, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance