USPTO serial 75637411
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Grand Cayman Island, VG
Grand Cayman Island, VG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas W. Sprinkle
DOUGLAS W SPRINKLE GIFFORD KRASS GROH SPRINKLEANDERSON & CITKOWSKI PC280 N OLD WOODWARD STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF CEREBRAL PALSY TO AFFECTED PERSONS AND THEIR FAMILIES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 25, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |