Drawing for A NEW WAY IN WOMEN'S HEALTH

USPTO serial 75638449

A NEW WAY IN WOMEN'S HEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COGGINS, ROBERT H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A NEW WAY IN WOMEN'S HEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mario Aieta

MARIO AIETA AIETA & GRECO73 SPRING STSTE 601NEW YORK, NY 10012

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Personal deodorant mistsACTIVE
005Feminine hygiene products, namely, feminine hygiene cleansing towelettes and pads; contraceptive foams, sponges, jellies, and gels; contraceptive vaginal suppositories; pregnancy test kits for home use; vaginal anti-itching and anti-irritation creams; vaginal lubricants; and gels for use as vaginal moisture replenishersACTIVE
010CONTRACEPTIVE DIAPHRAGMSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Nov 5, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Nov 5, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 8, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 5, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 2, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 8, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 8, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 9, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 9, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 9, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 9, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 9, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 15, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 14, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 29, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 23, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance