USPTO serial 75638590
QCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EUGENIA S HANSEN
EUGENIA S HANSEN SIDLEY & AUSTIN717 N HARWOOD STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201-6507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, REGULATORS OF TARGET FACTORS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF HUMAN DISEASE, SUCH AS INFECTIOUS DISEASE, CANCER, GENETIC DISEASES, IMMUNOLOGIC DISORDERS, HEART DISEASE, NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE, AGING AND RELATED DISEASES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES AND PRE-RECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES FEATURING EDUCATIONAL PRESENTATIONS ON RATIONAL DRUG DESIGN | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | MAGAZINES IN THE MEDICAL FIELD; MAGAZINES IN THE BUSINESS FIELD; PRINTED EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS DEALING WITH ISSUES RELATED TO RATIONAL DRUG DESIGN; PRINTED EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS DEALING WITH ISSUES RELATED TO TARGET REGULATORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF RATIONAL DRUG DESIGN | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DRUG RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; DRUG RESEARCH AND CONSULTING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cytoclonal Pharmaceutics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cytoclonal Pharmaceutics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QCT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 21, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |