USPTO serial 75639034
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tamara A. Miller
TAMARA A MILLER LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for file compression and for the creation of other computer programs, namely, for creation of setup programs, installation programs, uninstall programs, distribution programs, delivery programs, programs for electronic distribution of data, files, other programs, and contents via private and public global computer networks and local computer networks, and programs for distribution of data, files, other programs, and contents via physical media | ACTIVE | Apr 18, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |