USPTO serial 75639168
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH M STOLTE
KEITH M STOLTE BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications, namely, electronic books, electronic brochures, electronic magazines and electronic manuals, all relating to professional development, business management and team development | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | written materials, namely, books, brochures, magazines and manuals, all relating to professional development, business management and team development | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management consultation in the fields of personal and professional development, business management and team development | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting workshops and seminars in the field of professional development, business management and team development | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |