USPTO serial 75639290
MASTERPEACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MASTERPEACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Silver Spring, MD
Silver Spring, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard H. Zaitlen
RICHARD H ZAITLEN PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP725 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2800LOS ANGELES, CA 92626-7122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | MASSAGE OIL, BUBBLE BATH, BATH GEL, AND NON-MEDICATED BATHING SALTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |