USPTO serial 75639337
MAXIM'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2596538Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 2002
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXIM'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SW19 4DH, GB
London SW19 4DH, GB
London SW19 4DH, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANET DORE
DOCKET DEPT MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer, ale and porter; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely fruit drinks, fruit juices, lemonades, soda, mineral water, quinine water, seltzer water, spring water, table water, tomato juice, vegetable juice, milk of almonds and orgeat; syrups for making fruit drinks, soft drinks and lemonade; powders for effervescing beverages, namely soft drinks; essences for making beverages, namely soft drinks; essences for the manufacture of liqueurs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |