USPTO serial 75639350
VERSATEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 14, 2003
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VERSATEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Versatel Corporate Services Company
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Versatel Corporate Services Company
Versatel Corporate Services Company
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Versatel Corporate Services Company
VERSATEL CORPORATE SERVICES LTD.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
VERSATEL CORPORATE SERVICES LTD.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Zalewa
JAMES D ZALEWA LEYDIG VOIT & MAYERTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Printing and graphic art design services; consultation services in the field of printing and graphic art design; website design services; CD-ROMS design services, consultation services in the field of website design and CD-ROMS design | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Versatel Corporate Services Company
- Other trademarks owned by Versatel Corporate Services Company
- Other trademarks owned by VERSATEL CORPORATE SERVICES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by VERSATEL CORPORATE SERVICES LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VERSATEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |