CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for HARLEQUIN

USPTO serial 75639406

HARLEQUIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARLEQUIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Louie

Dana Breitman Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.6th Floor 866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely face and body powders, eyebrow pencils, eyeliner pencils, lip liner pencils, nail polishes, lipsticks, rouges, perfumes, eau de colognes, foundation creams; toiletries, namely antiperspirants for personal use, hair shampoo, face creams, hand creams, body creams, body soaps, toilet soaps, face soaps, non-medicated bath salts, make-up removing lotions, creams and liquidsACTIVE—
016greeting cards, notepaperACTIVE—
018book bags, duffel bags, cosmetic bags sold emptyACTIVE—
020non-metal key chainsACTIVE—
025clothing, namely t-shirts, sweatshirts, sweat pants, nightshirts, pajamas, socks, jackets, caps, hats, scarves and tiesACTIVE—
028dollsACTIVE—
030chocolateACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2006DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 23, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 18, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 10, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 21, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 16, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance