Drawing for NEXT GENERATION SOLUTIONS FOR THE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 75639640

NEXT GENERATION SOLUTIONS FOR THE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXT GENERATION SOLUTIONS FOR THE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CYNTHIA K. NICHOLSON

CYNTHIA K NICHOLSON PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFE LLP1200 NINETEENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS MANAGEMENTACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2001PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
May 30, 2001PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Apr 4, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance