USPTO serial 75640365
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ALDO GROUP INC./LE GROUPE ALDO INC, THE
Ville St-Laurent, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by ALDO GROUP INC./LE GROUPE ALDO INC, THE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL GIFT BOXES; METAL KEY CHAINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | SUNGLASSES; EYEGLASS CASES | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | COSTUME JEWELRY, NAMELY WATCHES, EARRINGS, RINGS, BRACELETS, NOSE CLIPS, PINS, NECKLACES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | AGENDAS, PENS, PENCILS, PENCIL CASES, NOTEBOOKS, STICKERS, AND CARDBOARD GIFT BOXES, AND PAPER BAGS; LUNCH BAGS; CHECK BOOK HOLDERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | HANDBAGS; PURSES, COIN PURSES, WALLETS, ATTACHE CASES, TRAVELLING BAGS, STATIONERY TYPE PORTFOLIOS, BRIEFCASE TYPE PORTFOLIOS, BRIEFCASES, SATCHELS, TOTE BAGS, DUFFEL BAGS, DRAWSTRING BAGS, CLUTCH BAGS, SHOE BAGS FOR TRAVEL, BACKPACKS, TEXTILE SHOPPING BAGS, PASSPORT CASES, WRITING CASES, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY, KEY CASES, AND UMBRELLAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | WOOD GIFT BOXES; NON-METAL KEY CHAINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | SHOE BAGS FOR STORAGE, GARMENT BAGS FOR STORAGE; GENERAL UTILITY BAGS FOR COMMERCIAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S FOOTWEAR, NAMELY; SHOES, SANDALS, SLIPPERS, BOOTS, HIKING BOOTS, MOCCASINS, SNEAKERS, LOAFERS, JOGGING SHOES, WALKING SHOES, WALKING BOOTS; BELTS, SUSPENDERS, SCARVES, GLOVES, HATS; MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, OUTERWEAR AND SPORTSWEAR, NAMELY; LEATHER AND SUEDE COATS, LEATHER AND SUEDE JACKETS, LEATHER AND SUEDE VESTS, LEATHER SKIRTS, LEATHER DRESSES, LEATHER PANTS, JACKETS, BLAZERS, COATS, RAINCOATS, OVERCOATS, TROUSERS, PANTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATSUITS, VESTS, DUFFEL COATS, LIGHTWEIGHT JACKETS, SWEATERS, PARKAS, TIES, SOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY; HAIR BANDS, BARRETTES, PONY-TAIL HOLDERS AND SHOE CLIPS, SHOE LACES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETAIL STORES FEATURING FOOTWEAR, CLOTHING, LEATHER APPAREL, HANDBAGS, LUGGAGE, WALLETS AND FASHION ACCESSORIES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |