USPTO serial 75640469
E4L
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNODGRASS, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E4L?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott B. Zolke
SCOTT B ZOLKE HEENAN BLAIKIE9401 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 1100BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | PHYSICAL CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY WEIGHT LIFTING BENCHES AND INCLINE BARS, EXERCISE LEG PRESS MACHINES, LEG CURL MACHINES, LEG EXTENSION MACHINES, HACK SQUAT MACHINES, SISSY SQUAT MACHINES, HIP MACHINES, BENCH PRESS MACHINES, CALF MUSCLE MACHINES, LOWER BACK MACHINES, ROWING MACHINES, CHIN-UP MACHINES, UPPER BODY MACHINES, ABDOMINAL MACHINES, NECK MACHINES, AND PARTS FOR SUCH MACHINES; ACCESSORIES FOR SUCH MACHINES INCLUDING SUPPORT RACKS FOR SUPPORTING PARTS AND ACCESSORIES, DUMBBELL SUPPORT HOLDERS, LEATHER PADDED BELTS, AND NYLON HEAD HARNESSES, WRIST WRAPS AND WRIST GLOVES, KNEE SUPPORTS, ANKLE STRAPS, WEIGHTS, DUMBBELLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |