USPTO serial 75640536
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LYNNE E. GRAYBEAL
LYNE E GRAYBEAL TRADEMARK GROUP/IPPERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software that facilitates electronic commerce, namely, computer software for use in identifying and collecting information about demand for goods and services from individual potential purchasers of goods and services, for grouping individual purchasers into bargaining units to purchase specific goods and services of others, for providing and updating the price of goods and services for groups of purchasers based on supply and demand for those goods and services, and for measuring the demand for particular products and services for use in marketing decision-making and the rapid analysis of prices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |