Drawing for WE-COMMERCE

USPTO serial 75640536

WE-COMMERCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DICKINSON, RODNEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE-COMMERCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LYNNE E. GRAYBEAL

LYNE E GRAYBEAL TRADEMARK GROUP/IPPERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software that facilitates electronic commerce, namely, computer software for use in identifying and collecting information about demand for goods and services from individual potential purchasers of goods and services, for grouping individual purchasers into bargaining units to purchase specific goods and services of others, for providing and updating the price of goods and services for groups of purchasers based on supply and demand for those goods and services, and for measuring the demand for particular products and services for use in marketing decision-making and the rapid analysis of pricesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 17, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
May 21, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 21, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 14, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Nov 14, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 17, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 21, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 31, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 21, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 21, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 6, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 17, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance