Drawing for THE CHARMING HOTELS

USPTO serial 75640622

THE CHARMING HOTELS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CHARMING HOTELS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon O. Nelson

JON O NELSON BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD10 S WACKER DRSTE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Published materials and prints, namely, stationery, booklets, instructional materials, brochures and newsletters all in the field of food lodging and hotel servicesACTIVE
041Education and entertainment services, namely, conduct of training programs for hotel and restaurant services, entertainment in the nature of servicing banquets, receptions, and sporting eventsACTIVE
042Hotel and lodging services; restaurant services; recreational services in the nature of swimming pools, tennis courts, golfing facilities, fitness facilities; physical fitness consultation; health spas and beauty salons; conference and meeting room servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
May 20, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2001RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED
Jan 23, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 23, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance