Drawing for WALK IN, PHONE IN, LOG IN

USPTO serial 75640650

WALK IN, PHONE IN, LOG IN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WALK IN, PHONE IN, LOG IN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALLISON C COLLARD

ALLISON C COLLARD COLLARD & ROE, PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE ORDERING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AUDIO EQUIPMENT, VIDEO EQUIPMENT AND RECORDED MUSIC VIDEOS; RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AUDIO EQUIPMENT, VIDEO EQUIPMENT AND RECORDED MUSIC VIDEOS; TELEPHONE SHOP-AT-HOME SERVICES FEATURING COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AUDIO EQUIPMENT, VIDEO EQUIPMENT AND RECORDED MUSIC VIDEO AND MAIL ORDER SERVICES FEATURING COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AUDIO EQUIPMENT, VIDEO EQUIPMENT AND RECORDED MUSIC VIDEOSACTIVEDec 3, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 29, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 29, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Oct 12, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Aug 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 14, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 14, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance