USPTO serial 75640695
RELIABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RELIABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD P KANANEN
RONALD P KANANEN RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC1233 20TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Sporting goods in the nature of ski equipment, namely, Alpine and Nordic skiing apparel, skis, boots, helmets, poles, protective gear, tuning supplies, ski luggage, training aids, glove and boot dryers, warmers; and golf equipment, namely, golf course supplies, range mats, range nets, tee accessories, course markers and marking systems, rakes, turf covers, fencing, outdoor furniture, and course maintenance and protective flooring surfaces | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 5, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |