USPTO serial 75640985
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Minneapolis, MN
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
FALLS CHURCH, VA
Other trademarks owned by NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
NORTHROP GRUMMAN INNOVATION SYSTEMS LLC
DULLES, VA
Other trademarks owned by NORTHROP GRUMMAN INNOVATION SYSTEMS LLC
Hopkins, MN
Hopkins, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Sitzmann
Timothy D. Sitzmann Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.225 South Sixth StreetCapella Tower Suite 3500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ high-strength, low-weight parts, namely, parts made of metals and composites for use in missile launch tubes ammunition, munitions and military aircraft; recycled metal from ordnance reclamation ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2003 |
| 007 | propulsion systems, namely solid propulsion strap-on boosters; ballistic missile solid propulsion boosters; solid rocket motors and gas generators for missiles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2003 |
| 009 | [ signal analysis systems for defense comprised of a computer controlled radar and communications simulator for signal intercept analysis and direction finding; automatic fire control systems comprised of computer controlled artillery; surface command, control, communication and data dissemination systems comprised of surveillance sensors, video-image transmitters and communication units; vehicle command and control systems consisting of a display, a control unit, a ballistic computer and weapon controllers; battlefield management and monitoring systems comprised of surveillance sensors, video-image transmitters, communications units and computer controlled artillery; millimeter wave and laser radar seeker systems comprised of a surveillance/identification station and an electronic countermeasures station; ] missile warning systems comprised of a computer processor, control indicator, and optical sensor converters, which detect incoming missiles [ ; electronic warfare systems comprised of a surveillance/identification station and an electronic countermeasures station; electronic warfare systems comprised of a transportable radar and communications simulator; real-time reconnaissance, surveillance and target acquisition systems comprised of surveillance sensors, video-image transmitters, communications units and computer controlled artillery, and specialized disposable and rechargeable batteries ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2003 |
| 013 | [ ammunition, namely, medium caliber ammunition, tank ammunition, and smart tank ammunition; munitions, namely, artillery delivered munitions, ground vehicle delivered munitions, air-delivered munitions, submunitions, anti-tank munitions, anti- material munitions, smart munitions, demolition munitions, and tactical munitions dispensers; weapons,, namely, shoulder-fired weapons, precision guided weapons, smart weapons and tactical missile warheads; ] electronic fuzes for mortar, artillery, projectiles, air- delivered weapons and penetrating weapons; [ countermeasure devices, namely, infrared countermeasure flares, and shipboard countermeasure systems; pyrotechnic products, namely, impulse cartridges, tracers, marine location markers, explosive squibs, colored smoke and signaling devices, screening markers and day/night signals; gun powders; propellants for medium caliber ammunition, tank ammunition, munitions and rockets ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2003 |
| 042 | [ ordnance reclamation services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 10, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 8, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |