USPTO serial 75641010
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Olivera Medenica
Olivera Medenica Medenica Law PLLC3, Columbus Circle, 15th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES, INCLUDING LAWYER REFERRALS BY ON-LINE COMMUNICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 9, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |