USPTO serial 75641401
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
INTERNATIONAL FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SOCIETY, INC.
LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SOCIETY, INC.
INTERNATIONAL FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SOCIETY, INC.
GLENDALE, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SOCIETY, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELISABETH TOWNSEND BRIDGE
ELISABETH TOWNSEND BRIDGE WHYTE HIRSCHBOECK DUDEK S.C.555 EAST WELLS STREETSTE 1900MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3819| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CONFERENCES IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION AND DISTRIBUTING COURSE MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |