USPTO serial 75641533
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Lin Ya Oist., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, CN
Lin Ya Oist., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, CN
Lin Ya Oist., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, CN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina J. Hudson
Sabrina J. Hudson H. J. Heinz CompanyP.O. Box 57Pittsburgh, PA 15230UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Dumplings, steamed stuffed buns, glutinous rice balls, spring rolls, spring roll skins, shaomai, glutinous rice wrapped in bamboo leaves, wontons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |