USPTO serial 75642015
SYFX ALWAYS CLEAR AND DISTINCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYFX ALWAYS CLEAR AND DISTINCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Walnut Creek, CA
Walnut Creek, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN J CAMOZZI
JOHN J CAMOZZI DILLINGHAM & MURPHY LLP225 BUSH ST FL 6SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-4207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND ENCODED INTEGRATED CIRCUITS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE GENERATING, PROCESSING, RECORDING, TRANSMITTING, ENCODING, DECODING, RECEIVING, AND REPRODUCTION OF AUDIO OR VIDEO ELECTRONIC SIGNALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | LICENSING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE GENERATING, PROCESSING, RECORDING, TRANSMITTING, ENCODING, DECODING, RECEIVING, AND REPRODUCTION OF AUDIO OR VIDEO ELECTRONIC SIGNALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, NAMELY, TECHNOLOGY, ALGORITHMS, AND KNOW-HOW USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE GENERATING, PROCESSING, RECORDING, TRANSMITTING, ENCODING, DECODING, RECEIVING, AND REPRODUCTION OF AUDIO OR VIDEO ELECTRONIC SIGNALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SYFX
- Other trademarks owned by SYFX
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SYFX ALWAYS CLEAR AND DISTINCT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |