USPTO serial 75642543
PEEL "A" PRICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEEL "A" PRICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M6K 1W9, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED PAPER SIGNS, PRINTED PAPER SIGNS CONTAINING DECALS, APPLIQUES IN THE FORM OF DECALS, DECALS, AND DISPLAY BOARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |