USPTO serial 75642802
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathon E. Pruden
JONATHON E PRUDEN KAUFMAN & CANOLESONE COMMERCIAL PL STE 2000NORFOLK, VA 23510UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Health care | ABANDONED | Oct 10, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |