Drawing for APACHE

USPTO serial 75642896

APACHE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2568832Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 14, 2002
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APACHE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID G. DUCKWORTH

APACHE MICRO PERIPHERALS INC11321 DELPHINIUM AVEFOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-1710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for communications applications, namely, for sending electronic mail, facsimiles, voice and written messages over a telephone network or over a global computer information networkSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2019C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
May 17, 2019CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 8, 2019CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 2019PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 18, 2012NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED—
May 18, 2012RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 18, 201289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 18, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 10, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Apr 19, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 26, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2008815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 14, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 25, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 14, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance