USPTO serial 75642908
Serial No. 75642908
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2940278Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 12, 2005
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 75642908?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Peterborough PE3 6JY, GB
Peterborough PE3 6JY, GB
London EC3A 7BU, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RANDOLPH B. HOUSTON, JR.
Shannon T. Vale Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.98 San Jacinto BoulevardSuite 1100Austin, TX 78701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized business information storage and retrieval services; computerized accounting; computerized database management; computerized data processing and business management advice and consultation, local authority revenue and benefits personnel management services, payroll and pension preparation; business and personnel consultation namely regarding recruitment and contracts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 6, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |